banner

Diagram for Delinquents

twitter

biblio 1

biblio 2

Such Trivia As Comic Books
You Always Have to Slug 'em
The Road to the Child
The Wrong Twist
Retooling for Illiteracy
Design for Delinquency
I Want To Be a Sex Maniac
Bumps and Bulges


Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional

The Wertham Interview

The following interview was originally presented in RBCC #115 (Oct 1974). Most sincere thanks to Coop for providing it.

You were rather instrumental in creating the conditions that led to the development of the code.

Look, I am a psychiatrist. I primarily work in mental hygiene clinics, outpatients departments...usually in free ones. I was the director of the mental hygiene clinic in Hopkins. I was the director of the biggest mental hygiene clinic in the United States, at Bellevue Hosptital in New York, and I founded the first integrated psychiatric clinic in the ghetto area, Harlem, in New York. This is by way of background, how I got into this, you see.

Now I'm not primarily interested in comic books, but I am interested in people. And it turned out, in these clinics, many of our patients were young people. This goes back to the middle '40s. Now, in the course of examining these kids, I saw all kinds of troubled young people. They were not necessarily delinquents, they were not necessarily sick, but they had learning difficulties or home difficulties or reading difficulties and so on. My point of view in psychiatry is that one cannot help a person unless one knows the circumstances in which he lives, in detail.... it was brought to me by these kids that outside influences have an enormous influence, namely the mass media. And we found out that quite a number of these kids had these comic books sticking out of their pockets. My assistants started drawing my attention to this.

We found, for instance, that among the many different factors that affected a child, the depiction of crime, of violence, of murder, of rape, of explosion, of destruction... has an effect on them. Now, I was very much interested in violence. I've studied violence and I have written several books about it, I've testified in court, I've lectured police departments. In the course of that we came to the conclusion that this has an effect on children.

Now I never said, and I don't think it is so, that a child reads a comic book and then goes out and beats up his sister or commits a holdup.

You were not maintaining that there was a clearcut cause and effect relationship?

You see, in human life, in psychological life, it isn't so that you can say one factor has a clear causal effect on anything else. It's not like a billiard ball hitting a billiard ball. This is a web of circumstances... any factor that is detrimental is only so in connection with other factors.

It isn't so that the comic book - or whatever it is, the movies, etc - alone does it. All I think, it has an effect.

Then your conclusions have been misrepresented all these years.

Oh sure. Oh, yeah. But I mean, look, this is an industry that... I had no idea at that time that I was doing any harm to the industry. I give you an example: If I am interested in air pollution, it doesn't mean I'm interested in a specific factory. I was just saying that these outside influences have a definite influence. And I can give you in one word what this influence is: It desensitizes these kids. There not sensitive anymore to human suffering, they become hardened.

Regardless of what your intentions were, Doctor, I think it would be fair to say that your book had an explosive effect on both the industry and the social order.

Yeah, well, that's true. It had an enormous number of reviews and so on. But the point is, you know what the effect was primarily: that for the first time these parents looked at these comic books themselves. You know, I also thought that comic books were filled with rabbits and animals and nice fairy stories. But then I read them and I thought... why,these girls have needles stuck in their eyes, and baseball games are played with the human head, and, and crimes are depicted, and blood flows... I didn't know that, you see.

So then the kids came to us and we made a very extensive scientific study by... a child would tell us his dream, and he uses as his excuse... and we say, well, what about these comic books? And he says, well, I bring them to you. So he brought them to us and we got this enormous collection of comic books.

And I predicted then that, since violence is connected with so many other things, that more and more young children will commit violence.

I said that in 1947. Now at that time it was, ach, that's ridiculous, a boy of fourteen to commit murder, it was absolutely unknown. I had never seen a murderer of fourteen. Nowadays you speak to a police department and they suspect the fifteen, sixteen, fourteen year old boys. Absolutely. What I predicted then has not only come true, but absolutely true. But in those days it was unheard of. Well, I based it not specifically on comic books - I never did - but on all the mass media.

Now, I had in the beginning no idea of advocating any methods whatever; I regarded it just from the point of view of treating people, as a scientific... but then I got so much objection and so much criticism and so much attack, you see... I tell you what happened: when my book came out I found out that I was being followed by detectives. There were two detectives who spent about six weeks; they asked everyone who knew me, asked my friends and they even went to my patients, and they asked: What is Dr. Wertham's sex life, does he like girls, does he like boys, what car does he drive, does he pay his taxes, does he drink? It was very funny.

Now, I had no intention of suggesting any methods; but finally, when I was asked off and on by responsible people, what do you really suggest should be done, then I made a suggestion. And this is very important: it had absolutely nothing to do with the Code. I suggested that children the age of thirteen or under, that comic books... I never spoke of comic books, I only spoke of crime comic books. That is very important, because there are of course good comic books. But a crime is a crime; if you kill a girl, it's a crime. So I had the category of crime comic books.

And all I said was that children of thirteen should not... that comic books should not be directly displayed to them. That's all. In other words, it should not be that a boy of twelve goes into a store and sits there and sees all these things. I said they should not be directly displayed to the child.

Now if the papa or the mama goes to the store and says, "Please, have you any comic books? I want to show them how you can kill a girl. They only know how to strangle them and I want to show them that you can stab them from the back, or you can take their liver out. Have you got a comic book?"

And he says, "Yes, sure." Well, they can buy it, you know? I didn't want any censorship for adults. They can do what they want. But the child itself...

Of course you have been closely identified with censorship over the years.

Well, I tell you this: This was partly a deliberate misrepresentation. The comic book industry, apart from following me with detectives... I'm afraid my life wasn't interesting enough. I didn't have any Argentinian firecrackers jumping out of my car. They didn't find enough... you know, I'm almost ashamed. But one of the biggest public relation firms in the country had the task of making all these things up deliberately.

Your critics include the current administrator of the Code, who declares that there was absolutely no cause and effect ever demonstrated between comics and aberrant juvenile behavior. I wonder, are you still convinced of the legitimacy of your theories, have you revised or...

I am much more convinced. Look, all these things... I mean, I have nothing to do with the Code, I don't know the administrator... but the point is, to say that, that's a very, very serious thing. You know, cause-and-effect is a big word. Look, a patient comes to me and he has a headache, yes? Now shall I wait till I only find out a strict, absolute cause and effect or shall I find out if he smokes too much or drinks too much? I mean, I think of all these factors. Lots of people are exposed to... comic books are now a minor problem. They're not so important any more. The important media now are television and movies. And the movies are, of course, filled with violence. Filled. I mean, this last movie, Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia, twenty-one people are killed in that.

Now, the question of cause and effect. Let's discuss that. What is cause? A cause means anything that has an influence on people. The mass media, they obviously have an influence, for good or for bad. And if you show a lot of violence then finally people get used to it and the results are... after all, the violence among young people is tremendously increased. And why should that happen? There must be some influence. And I say that mass media are one, one of the most important factors. And the people say there is no cause and effect? That seems to me to be utterly unscientific. How can anyone be a psychiatrist and not realize that people get affected by things?

There is one other thing they say about me, that I am for censorship. You've heard that, probably.

Well, yeah...

Now, I am the first psychiatrist in the United States who was admitted to a federal court as an expert witness against censorship. I've defended nudist magazines, I've always been on the other side of censorship. There has not been one case where I have been for censorship.

Then you feel you've been subjected to character assassination all these years?

That's a mild expression. Yes. Look, don't get me wrong, I'm not in any way bitter. I think it's quite funny. You know, I've been accused of practically everything except lesbianism. They never accused me of that. How they missed that I don't know.

What are your current professional circumstances, especially with regard to comics? You had been involved in a study of fanzines...

My professional circumstances are primarily psychiatry and psychotherapy. I have a big psychotherapy practice. I'm still working on violence. I have nothing to do with comic books anymore, but I'm very much interested in movies. Yes, I tell you what happened with fanzines. People sent them to me and I got interested... and I got a very interesting collection of these amateur magazines. These are magazines that, to my mind, are very important, although nobody pays attention to them. In the sense that they are completely free from censorship. These are magazines that a young man gets out by himself, nobody interferes with it, he sends it to people who want it. Outside the profit motive. So I collected them. You see, I am interested in communication because that has to do with violence. Because I think that communication is the opposite of violence. Men who rape, you see, that is the opposite of communication. If he communicated with a girl, you see, he wouldn't have to kill her.

Okay.

So I got interested and finally wrote a book about it - the only book that has ever been written about fanzines. It's published by Southern Illinois University Press. Fanzines are very nice. They don't have any violence. They're quite different. In other words, a man can be a comic book reader... they make me out to be a terrific fanatic. I'm not at all. I mean, there are people who resist that. You see, I believe in human beings. I believe that human beings have an enormous resistance and there are many of them who resisted these bad influences. They ask me to write for them. I've written for a number of fanzines, because I'm PRAISING them, you see. There has been a rumour around that I'm against fanzines, I'm against everything. The point is that I've discovered fanzines and I think they're absolutely very important and they give me a very good feeling about young people today.

I had wondered to what extent you were still involved with studying comics because I was curious what your professional opinion is of the comic material today, twenty years after the code was adopted.

Two things have to be said. In the first place, I can't talk. You see, when I spoke about comic books in those days, I knew... I mean, these kids brought me all their comic books and the crime comic books that were... there were so many. Now, I haven't got such a complete overview. My impression is that the worst kinds of things... I don't think you see anybody any more sticking a needle in a girl's eye. You don't see any where they play with human intestines. See, the interesting thing is... These atrocities. I was the first. I was the only one who pointed it out. Nobody had spoken out when I began to seak about it. Nobody. I was all wrong, you see.

The first time I ever spoke about comic books at all I was under oath in Washington D.C., in a case where I was against censorship. That was a very difficult trial before the Post Office in 1947, and I was an expert psychiatrist testifying for the defense. And in cross-examination, the man said to me, in other words, you think all publics are all right and nothing is wrong. I said no, I don't think so at all, I have in my briefcase a lot of things that... all right, here, if you want them, here's the evidence. And they were absolutely horrified. Here was blood all over, here was every kind of murder you can think of, here were men who were... their noses were cut off, their eyes were... blood. The judge said, "Doctor, where did you get this kind of [book]?" I said, "Your honour, I bought these on the corner. You can go right there and buy some too."

I can't tell you all the rotten things they said. They said when a boy is in trouble and he comes to Dr. Wertham's clinic, he's asked, "Do you read comics?" And if he said "Yes, the comic books made me commit a crime," then Dr. Wertham believed that. No single child has ever accused comic books. None. They never said that. WE said it. Look, I don't ask a boy when he has the measles, "Where do you get your measles from?"

If a child goes to a movie, what's he supposed to see? Chinatown? Horrible, horrible, blood spurting all over; and of course they think this is...

Real life, yes.

It IS real life. That's the trouble.

Comics have gained more and more legitimacy in recent years. They've become valuable tools in remedial education. All in all, it's a far cry from the legitimacy level of twenty years ago.

I have to tell you this: That comic books are used in remedial reading and so on, that's completely wrong. They're very bad for reading. That's been very carefully studied. There have been important scientific studies made. They're NOT good for reading. I get letters from comic-oriented people and they're always full of bad spelling.

Comic books are not good for reading because in reading you have you read from left to right. But in a comic book you have these balloons, and they interfere with reading. So for remedial reading it's a very bad thing.

Yes, comics have become legitimate and I don't think it's a good sign for the cultural state of the nation. It would be better if people read books or newspapers.


© 2008-2017 OrpheusEnd Inc. This archive is maintained to ensure the integrity and preservation of Fredric Wertham's published writings. It is strictly non-profit and its sole purpose is the advancement of education and scholarship. And remember: NOTHING is original. Steal from anywhere that resonates with inspiration or fuels your imagination. Select only things to steal from that speak directly to your soul. If you do this, your work (and theft) will be authentic. Authenticity is invaluable; originality is nonexistent. And don't bother concealing your thievery - celebrate it if you feel like it. In any case, always remember what Jean-Luc Godard said: "It's not where you take things from - it's where you take them to."

Ten Cent Plague

"Such was the making of a tenuous new form of American popular art," Hajdu writes in a typically witty, stimulating passage:

"[A] vehicle for giving away used goods of diminished value became a forum for selling discarded goods and new goods by people who could not compete with the makers of the used goods when they were new."

A former editor at Entertainment Weekly, author of a biography of jazz composer Billy Strayhorn ("Lush Life") and a group portrait of Bob Dylan, Joan Baez and Richard and Mimi Farina ("Positively 4th Street"), Hajdu takes popular culture seriously without taking it for something it isn't.

"[F]ree-spirited, willful girls . . . thought and acted independently" in romance comics, which, for a few halcyon years, enjoyed the same freedom that had once animated superhero and crime comics. " 'The kids really liked what we were trying to do, I think because we didn't treat them like kids,' " said Joe Simon, co-creator of the first love comic, "True Romance." " 'We were practically kids ourselves.' " Romance comics honored the industry's lurid heritage, too, with titillating tales like "I Joined a Teen-Age Sex Club" and "My Mother Was My Rival." For a time these escaped the notice of psychiatrists and moralists, but they would not be so oblivious to the comic industry's next explosion of adolescent unruliness.

When Bill Gaines inherited Educational Comics (soon shortened to EC) in 1947, the company published titles like "Tiny Tot Comics" and was $100,000 in debt. Then he hooked up with artist Al Feldstein, who shared Gaines' love of scary radio dramas like "Inner Sanctum." The series of horror titles EC launched in 1950 -- "Tales From the Crypt" being the most infamous -- were macabre exercises known for "cynicism, readiness to defy convention, and willingness to shock." And shock they did, not just for their gore, Hajdu notes, but for their "portrayals of marriage and family life as sources of unbearable torment. . . . In EC's horror paradigm, the true graveyard was the living room of the American home."

The publisher added insult to injury in 1952 with Mad, a blast of satirical derision at the adult world. The grown-ups were not amused, and this time the warnings went beyond newspaper articles to alarmist books like "Seduction of the Innocent" and congressional hearings on juvenile delinquency that devoted two days exclusively to comic books in April 1954. Comic-book foes had scant evidence for their contention that reading comics led to juvenile delinquency, Hajdu says, and they seldom bothered to listen to anyone who actually read or created comics.

Bowing to pressure, EC discontinued its horror comics in September 1954. Over the next nine months, bills outlawing or regulating comics were passed in more than a dozen states. By 1956 the number of comic books published in the U.S. had dropped from 650 to 250, and the ones remaining were drearily sanitized. Only Mad survived with its attitude intact, repackaged as a magazine and hence not subject to restrictive laws.

Yet comics had the last laugh, Hajdu suggests in a final interview with R. Crumb, who as a teenager in the late '50s relished out-of-print EC comics: "The art quality was the tops, and they had the best storytelling. . . . [T]hey were forbidden, and that made them all the more exciting."

From Crumb and his peers came the underground comix of the '60s, direct progenitor of today's graphic novels. A despised medium for kids is today a lively branch of popular culture unabashedly consumed by adults; graphic novels even get attention in prestigious book reviews. Comic books have grown up, but Hajdu's affectionate portrait of their rowdy adolescence will make readers hope they never lose their impudent edge.

----------

Wendy Smith's book reviews appear frequently in the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post, and she has published several essays in The American Scholar.


Friedrich Ignaz Wertheimer was born in Nuremberg, Germany, in 1895 and studied at universities in Erlangen, Munich and Wurzburg, where he graduated with a medical degree in 1921. Following post-grad studies in Paris and Vienna he took up his professional life in Munich with an employment at the German Research Institute for Psychiatry before moving to the United States in 1922 to work at Johns Hopkins University's Phipps Psychiatric Clinic.

Now known under the anglicized name Fredric Wertham he received US citizenship in 1927 and moved to New York City in 1932 to work as the senior psychiatrist for the city's Department of Hospitals. As part of his primary job duties Wertham was called upon to provide psychiatric examinations in conjunction with criminal court cases, and in this function he became involved in the 1935 trial of serial killer Hamilton Howard "Albert" Fish, also known as the Gray Man, Werewolf of Wysteria, the Brooklyn Vampire, and The Boogeyman.

Working at the Bellevue Hospital Center and its well known psychiatric facilities since 1932 and appointed director of the Bellevue Mental Hygiene Clinic in 1936, Wertham came into increasing contact with troubled youth, alongside which he developed a clinical interest in popular culture.